By Cristina Johnson
SAN MARCOS, California, USA, Aug 25 2025 – For more than a century, asbestos was an indispensable fixture in the American industry, particularly the military. This versatile natural mineral was widely utilized to line Navy ships and strengthen their installations. What many were unaware of was that once damaged, asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) can release toxic fibers that could lodge in tissues covering internal organs of those exposed, where they build up over time.

This bioaccumulation causes severe inflammation and scarring over time, leading to life-threatening diseases such as lung cancer, asbestosis, and mesothelioma. Unfortunately, by the time the science was confirmed, service members had already been exposed, and thousands had tragically passed away.

Asbestos Nation’s map indicates that from 1999 to 2017, asbestos-related illnesses claimed the lives of 236,981 to 277,654 Americans—a toll that continues to rise. Annually, roughly 12,000 to 15,000 people succumbed to diseases that could have been prevented with immediate proactive measures.

Federal government attempted to curb the danger, although those actions were made only after asbestos contamination had already become pervasive. In 1989, the country’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) moved to restrict most ACMs .

Then, in 2002, the nation’s last asbestos mine finally shut down, which signaled what many hoped would be the end of domestic production.

Still, despite these significant milestones, chrysotile—the most exploited form of asbestos—remained legally accessible through imports and selective industrial applications. And such a critical oversight was only addressed in 2024 when the EPA pushed to prohibit the ongoing use of this mineral completely.

For the first time in a very long time, the US seemed poised to close the door on this lethal material. Now, the agency’s recent decision jeopardizes progress. Just this June 2025, EPA abruptly announced plans to reconsider the ban—a move that undermines enforcement, delays protections, and threatens to reopen the very channels of exposure the policy was designed to eliminate.

Veterans at a Disproportionate Risk of Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos exposure has profoundly impacted regions with significant military installations. Of these, California—which houses over 1.8 million veterans, the nation’s largest population of former service members—stands out as one of the most severely affected states.

Data show that between 1999 and 2017, more than 27,000 lives were lost to asbestos diseases in the Golden State alone, reflecting the repercussions stemming from the extensive use of ACMs in military bases such as the Naval Base San Diego and the now-decommissioned George Air Force Base.

Following California, Florida, and Pennsylvania—both of which host contaminated military and naval complexes like the old Naval Air Station Cecil Field and Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster—likewise logged more than 18,200 and 17,700 related deaths, respectively.

Among the asbestos-linked diseases, mesothelioma remains one of the most devastating, as it claimed nearly 55,000 American lives between 1999 and 2020 and accounted for around 2,000 to 3,000 new diagnoses each year.

Alarmingly, veterans across the country shoulder a heavier burden. Despite comprising only 6.1% of the adult population, they represent about a third of all mesothelioma cases reported yearly. Navy veterans’ asbestos exposure has been particularly severe, especially since their service required both living and working aboard vessels abundant in toxic materials.

True to that, research has shown that these veterans—along with merchant marine seamen—rank second in mesothelioma incidence, just next to the toll linked to the asbestos exposure of shipyard workers.

Why the Asbestos Ban Must Stand Firm

The EPA’s decision to revisit the chrysotile ban could unravel decades of progress in protecting public health. The science is apparent—no level of asbestos exposure is safe.

As such, weakening or delaying enforcement risks re-exposing workers, service members, and their families to supposedly preventable diseases. This reversal is particularly alarming in light of recent federal commitments to communities direly impacted by environmental toxins.

One notable example is the Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022—a bipartisan legislation—which expands access to healthcare and disability benefits for veterans suffering from service-related exposures, including asbestos.

While this legislation is indeed a step forward, its essential mission to support those who have sacrificed greatly for our nation may be jeopardized by concurrent policies that once again open the very channels of toxic exposure.

To retreat on the asbestos ban now would be to repeat the same mistakes that allowed this crisis to occur in the first place. A firm national ban is therefore more than a regulatory safeguard—it is a moral commitment.

By upholding the prohibition without compromise, policymakers can finally close a tragic chapter in the industrial and military past of the country while protecting future generations from the same fate.

About the Author

Cristina Johnson is a Navy veteran advocate for Asbestos Ships Organization, a nonprofit whose primary mission is to raise awareness about the dangers of asbestos exposure on Navy ships and assist veteransin navigating the VA claims process.